data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/706f8/706f86139ba2cac502aa28eabc8c333c99dad145" alt=""
Kinderhook, Kass, Kalhoun, nor Klay
Kan never surely win the day.
But if you want to know who Kan
You'll find in General Smith the man.
Not catchy enough, however, Smith was murdered by an angry mob only months into his campaign. (No voter apathy in the 19th century!)
Mormons were a subject of curiosity and controversy in the Pacific Northwest. There was a short-lived Mormon mission to the Indians named Fort Limhi near Lemhi Pass from 1855-1858. After the mission was disbanded there were frequent (unfounded) rumors of Mormon and Indian shenanigans in the interior of the Northwest. In 1858 the Pioneer and Democrat fretted that "there is good reason for believing that the Mormons are aiding and abetting the savages in a war of extermination of what they designate--Gentiles." By January of 1861 the Portland Standard was fretting that Mormon agents were active among the Indians of the interior "inciting the various tribes into open
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72afb/72afbd53101ed2ac5c914c4f4490b153d6fcad94" alt=""
But by the 1880s most of the northwest was swept by anti-Mormon movements, culminating perhaps in the famous Idaho Test Oath of 1884, which used the practice of polygamy to effectively disenfranchise all Idaho Mormons. Appeals went all the way to the Supreme Court, which upheld the law. By 1893 Idaho lawmakers repealed the act, but anti-Mormon language remained in the Idaho constitution until the 1980s.
[The above cartoon shows Idaho as a sword-bearing angel casting out the leather-winged abomination of Mormonism. It appeared in the Portland newspaper The West Shore and is reprinted in Carlos Schwantes' The Pacific Northwest: An Interpretive History.]
2 comments:
What was the anti-Mormon language in the constit that remained thru the 1980s?
John: "It was not until 1982 that voters amended the Idaho constitution to remove the language barring Mormons from voting," according to this page: http://imnh.isu.edu/digitalatlas/geog/rrt/part3/chp6/49.htm
Apparently the provision had not been enforced in many decades, but there you go.
Post a Comment